Saturday, January 2, 2010

"Canabis is a Dangerous Drug" according to Aussie Politician

You know, just when I think that maybe people will soon be open to a medicinal cannabis debate in Australia, some ignorant, publicity seeking politician comes along and shows us just how uneducated some people are in terms of the 'dreaded weed'.

In the state of Victoria (in Australia), the government has decided to continue to allow the sale of bongs in shops. Much to the disgust of the opposition leader, Ted Baillieu. Or, in his words:

"As long as John Brumby (ED: The Premier of Victoria) allows bongs to be sold freely at more than 100 outlets across the state, Victoria's young people and families will continue to suffer from the damaging effects of cannabis."

and

"Cannabis is a dangerous drug which causes serious mental and physical damage to many Victorians every year,"

The Honorable Mr Baillieu, can you define 'many'? Is it two? Is it 10? Is it hundreds? As far as I am aware, the latest studies from New Zealand and Australia suggest that a defective gene that cannot control dopamine flow when affected by THC cannabinoids is the cause of the rare occurrence of psychotic episodes in cannabis smokers. In fact,only 2% of the population is believed to have this defective gene. Of that 2% of the population, statistics tell us that only 20% of those will ever try pot, let alone become a chronic adolescent smoker. I say adolescent because scientists believe the gene is extremely susceptible during the brains growth stages, ie; adolescence and young adulthood.
Remember though that it is still theory, not proven science.


In an effort to ensure that everyone knew how ignorant he was on the subject of cannabis, he further said that

...research showed cannabis was a gateway drug into more dangerous illicit drugs, with most heroin and cocaine users first experimenting with cannabis.
The Honorable Mr Baillieu, the theory of cannabis being a 'gateway drug' was disproved quite some time ago. The current consensus among  researchers is that cannabis is a terminus drug. A 'terminus drug' is one with which people begin using or move on to but never move on to stronger drugs. In fact, they may even stop using other drugs such as alcohol and stay with the terminus drug.

Cannabis is one such drug. If my memory serves correctly, some 80% of people who have tried cannabis *never* move on to harder drugs. However, it can be assumed that users of harder drugs will use cannabis at some point.

The following pages may help you get clued up on the subject of cannabis Mr Baillieu:

Marijuana Myths

Ten Cannabis Myths

For links to further studies in respect to cannabis, feel free to browse back through this blog. In particular, these posts:

A Doctors View on Medicinal Cannabis

Video Case Studies and Stories (1)

Video Case Studies and Stories (2)

Cannibinoids Fight MRSA Bugs

From the National Library of Medicine in the US, a study showing that moderate cannabis use may prevent some cancers:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19638490

Finally, Mr Baillieu. Next time you talk of the evils of drugs, please be specific. I have no argument on the negative effects of any drug when abused. I also agree that certain drugs can be detrimental to growing brains. I think most of the Australian population would be aware of these risks.

However, cannabis is a valid medicine and is recognized as such in other countries such as Canada and The United States. It is time for people such as you Mr Baillieu, to start looking at the facts and encourage further research into a natural drug that could become a valuable commercial pharmaceutical crop.

(Source)

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

As a smoker on and off for about 15 years have to say that you make some very good points. While I'm smoking (or have access to the stuff) I stop drinking all together. I am finding more and more that I don't like alcohol while stoned, the most surprising thing about this is that I have a history of alcohol abuse (Dad + Brothers) in my family and it has been proven that Alcoholism is hereditary.

So called 'experts' such as Mr Baileu has admitted to never touching the stuff...how can he comment??? Disinformation about weed has been spread from such 'experts' since the stuff was first criminalised. Most of the 'facts' have since been proven to be absolute rubbish.

* violence - any smoker can tell you "bullshit"

* dope makes you a 'dope' - yet many people still manage to hold down full time employment while still being a user.

* crime will rise if it is legalised - one look at alcohol prohibition in the states will tell you this is a load of crap. Prohibition funds organised crime. End of story.

As a tax paying, hard working professional Australian how I choose to relax should be my own personal business. If I choose to be intoxicated, I'm not going to get drunk and act like a clown (which is currently legal....) I'm going to stay home smoke a bowl full and play some PS3 - currently illegal, But am I hurting anyone?

Indica Man said...

Thanks for your response.
I wish the politicians would listen to those of us who say:

"As a tax paying, hard working professional Australian how I choose to relax should be my own personal business. If I choose to be intoxicated, I'm not going to get drunk and act like a clown (which is currently legal....) I'm going to stay home smoke a bowl full and play some PS3 - currently illegal, But am I hurting anyone?"

I remember some thirty years ago reading an article about cannabis smoking being a 'victimless' crime. At the time a 'crime' had to have some sort of victim...other than yourself. What you choose to do is not a crime until someone else is negatively affected.